Legal Opinion
Khalsa v. Weinberger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1985No. 84-5880PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion and concurrence in the above matter, published at 759 F.2d 1411 (1985), are being amended in accordance with the attached Amended Opinion and partial concurrence and dissent.
AMENDED OPINION
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, a member of the Sikh religion, sued the Army for refusing to process his enlistment application because he could not comply with Army appearance regulations. The district court dismissed the suit on the ground that such regulations are not subject to judicial review. Appellant contends that the regulations are reviewable, that they were amended in violation…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Sergeant Perry Watkins v. United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Phillips v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- William v. Wenger v. Paul D. Monroe, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Adjutant General of the California National Guard California National GuardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. WinterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Sebra v. NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.