Legal Opinion
Holman v. Transamerica Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 3, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and it is unnecessary to answer the certified question.
Appellants sought to compel defendant insurance company to defend them under their general liability policy. Their former landlord had sued them in Federal court, alleging conversion of furnishings and personal property which had been stored at the premises pursuant to a provision in their lease. The insurer’s refusal to defend was based on an exclusion in the policy relating to bailed property. Specifically, the policy excluded "damage: (1)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Technicon Electronics Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fifth Avenue Pain Control Center v. Allstate InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
- Bragin v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Bingham v. 347 11th Street, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Seneca Insurance v. Cimran Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Seneca Insurance v. Cimran Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.