Legal Opinion

Seneca Insurance v. Cimran Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 2013Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Saxe, J.

This appeal provides us, once again, with the opportunity to reiterate and reaffirm an ancient principle of insurance law: that insurance coverage cannot be imposed based on liability for which insurance was not purchased or provided.

*168While summary judgment was properly denied to plaintiff, Seneca Insurance Company, on its cause of action seeking a declaration that the insurance policy it issued to defendants is void ah initio, we modify to grant Seneca’s motion for summary judgment declaring, upon its second cause of action, that it has no duty to defend and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Terk Technologies Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. National General Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Security Mutual Insurance v. PerkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Holman v. Transamerica InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Axelrod v. Maryland Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API