Legal Opinion

Schmitt v. City of Evansville

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 2007No. 82A05-0607-CV-413PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

Joan Schmitt filed a small claims action against the City of Evansville, the City of Evansville Board of Public Works, and the City of Evansville Sewer and Water Utility (“City”). She appeals the trial court’s order granting the City’s Motion for Judgment on the Evidence. We affirm.

Issue

Schmitt raises two issues on appeal, one of which we conclude to be dispositive and restate as: whether the trial court erred in granting the City’s Motion for Judgment on the Evidence where there was no evidence that the City had actual or constructive notice of the condition…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mangold Ex Rel. Mangold v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Bader v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Cavens v. ZaberdacIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. BourasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reed v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. KA v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API