Legal Opinion

Doherty v. Arcade Hotel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1942PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBossman, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, based upon a verdict. The defendant admits that on July 6, 1940, that being the date of the plaintiff’s injury, it “was engaged in the hotel business and owned and operated the hotel known as the Arcade Hotel in Klamath Falls, Oregon.” It also admits that on the day just mentioned “the plaintiff occupied a room in defendant’s hotel.” The evidence warrants a finding that he was there as a paying guest.

The appellant’s brief presents only one assignment of error:

“The Court erred in failing to grant a directed verdict…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  2. Nutt v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. BunceWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Ford v. Tremont Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  5. Scholl v. BelcherOregon Supreme Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gow v. Multnomah Hotel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Honea v. City Dairy, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Ritchie v. THOMASOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Danner v. ARNSBERGOregon Supreme Court · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API