Legal Opinion
McElduff v. McElduff
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 12, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*833The nonparty-appellant’s contention, in effect, that the husband waived the right to seek disqualification, is without merit under the circumstances of this case (see M.A.C. Duff, Inc. v ASMAC, LLC, 61 AD3d 828 [2009]; cf. Matter of Aaron W. v Shannon W., 96 AD3d 960 [2012]; Matter of Lovitch v Lovitch, 64 AD3d 710 [2009]).
“The disqualification of an attorney is a matter that rests within the sound discretion of the Supreme Court” (Trimarco v Data Treasury Corp., 91 AD3d 756, 756 [2012]; see Nationscredit Fin. Servs. Corp. v Turcios, 41 AD3d 802 [2007]). In order to disqualify counsel…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Aaron W. v. Shannon W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Nationscredit Financial Services Corp. v. TurciosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Lovitch v. LovitchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Trimarco v. Data Treasury Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Advanced Chimney, Inc. v. GrazianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Luciano v. KennedyNew York Supreme Court · 2015
- Macy's Inc. v. J.C. Penny Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Macy's Inc. v. J.C. Penny Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013