Funt v. Human Resources Administration
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Dismissal of this pro se action alleging negligent failure to provide assistance to avert eviction was proper as the Human Resources Administration was not a proper party (see NY City Charter § 396; Siino v Department of Educ. of City of N.Y., 44 AD3d 568 [2007]), the notice of claim was not served within 90 days after plaintiffs claim arose (General Municipal Law § 50-e [1] [a]), i.e., the date of plaintiffs eviction, plaintiff did not seek leave to serve a late notice of claim (General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]), and the action was commenced more than one year *491and 90 days after plaintiffs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pelaez v. SeideNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Kovit v. Estate of HallumsNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Siino v. Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brodt v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Komatsu v. New York City Human Resources Admin.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Komatsu v. New York City Human Resources Admin.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Jasper v. City of New York Corp. CounselAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018