Legal Opinion

Browning v. Wesco Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 17, 1929No. 6 Div. 226PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Appellant sought a temporary injunction against appellee. The business of appellee consists of an asphalt plant, erected across the street from complainant’s home, which is a four-apartment dwelling, in which complainant occupies an apartment.

The asphalt plant and equipment used in executing contracts with its product is estimated to be of the value of, to wit, $75,000; that a shutdown would entail á loss of $1,000 a day; that they employ about 200 men, with an average pay roll of $4,500 per week; that it woxdd cost about $12,000 to move the plant; that when the hearing was had, it was paving…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cullman Property Co. v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Davis v. Sowell & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. English v. Progress Electric Light & Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Jones v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Woodstock Operating Corporation v. QuinnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barran v. RodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Ferguson v. Commercial BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Martin Bldg. Co. v. Imperial Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Mobile County v. Barnes-Creary Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Owens v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API