Browning v. Wesco Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
Appellant sought a temporary injunction against appellee. The business of appellee consists of an asphalt plant, erected across the street from complainant’s home, which is a four-apartment dwelling, in which complainant occupies an apartment.
The asphalt plant and equipment used in executing contracts with its product is estimated to be of the value of, to wit, $75,000; that a shutdown would entail á loss of $1,000 a day; that they employ about 200 men, with an average pay roll of $4,500 per week; that it woxdd cost about $12,000 to move the plant; that when the hearing was had, it was paving…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cullman Property Co. v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Davis v. Sowell & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- English v. Progress Electric Light & Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Jones v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Woodstock Operating Corporation v. QuinnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barran v. RodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Ferguson v. Commercial BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Martin Bldg. Co. v. Imperial Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Mobile County v. Barnes-Creary Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Owens v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.