Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Teledyne Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided September 7, 2004No. 1:00-cv-01741PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARNES, District Judge.
This case is presently before the Court on an Application by Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (hereinafter “Movant” or “Teledyne”) For Order To Show Cause Why Arthur Alan Wolk (hereinafter “Respondent” or ‘Wolk”) Should Not Be Held In Contempt [175]. On March 22, 2004[214], the Court denied Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss [185] and set down a hearing date on the Contempt Petition, thereby implicitly granting Movant’s Application for Order to Show Cause [175]. (See also April 20, 2004 Order [219] (set-» ting out basis for March 22, 2004 decision).) Accordingly, it…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Michael D. Van Etten v. Bridgestone/Firestone, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- William Riccard v. Prudential Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eigen v. Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Smith v. PefanisDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
- Stillwater of Crown Point Homeowner's Ass'n v. KovichDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
- Wolk v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Royal Surplus Lines Insurance v. Coachmen Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.