Legal Opinion

MARCISZ, ET UX. v. Osborne

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1954No. 18,439PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBowen, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien brought by the appellee against the appellants, husband and wife. The complaint was in two paragraphs, the first being to foreclose the mechanic’s lien, and the second for quantum meruit for labor and material furnished.

Issues were joined upon appellee’s second amended complaint in two paragraphs. The first paragraph alleged that appellee and appellants entered into a written contract for the construction of a certain dwelling house for appellants for the sum of $13,600; that the appellee furnished…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sage v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Mann v. SchnarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Kendall Lumber & Coal Co. v. RomanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. TrzopIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Premier Investments v. Suites of America, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. White v. CrowIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  3. SHANKS v. FisherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. DeArmond v. CarterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. DeARMOND v. CARTER D/B/A, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API