Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 21, 1993PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PEAY, Judge.

The defendant pled guilty to second degree burglary.1 The defendant appeals as of right from the trial court’s dismissal of his post-conviction petition to set aside the plea as unconstitutional.2 We remand for an eviden-tiary hearing to determine whether the defendant filed his petition within the statute of limitations for the Tennessee Post-Conviction Procedure Act.

*6On October 12, 1976, the defendant entered a guilty plea to the charge of second degree burglary and was sentenced to three years. A Petition for Post-Conviction Relief was filed with the Clerk of Court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. MacKeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Case v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Crittenden v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Rickman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  3. Handley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  4. Charles Steven Shivers v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
  5. Corry Merriweather v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API