Legal Opinion
King v. Apfel
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided October 15, 1997No. 1:96 CV 114 DDNPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
991 F.Supp. 1101 (1997)
Byron C. KING, Plaintiff,
v.
Kenneth S. APFEL,[1] Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
No. 1:96 CV 114 DDN.
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Southeastern Division.
October 15, 1997.
Therese A. Schellhammer, Little and Schellhammer, Poplar Bluff, MO, for Plaintiff.
Wesley D. Wedemeyer, Office of U.S. Attorney, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant.
MEMORANDUM
NOCE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This cause is before the Court upon the parties' cross motions for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Connie L. BAKER, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Sigrid R. CLINE, Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Gavin v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wallace v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
- Bennett v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner ofDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024