Legal Opinion

United States v. Miller

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon

Decided September 28, 1908No. Nos. 3,131, 3,132PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Equity. On plea of statute of limitations.

1Opinion of the Court

WOLVERTON, District Judge.

This suit was instituted to set aside a patent conveying a tract of the public lands, on the grounds of fraud practiced upon the general government, inducing its issuance. The patent bears date May 8, 1901. The bill of complaint was filed March 22d previous. A subpoena was issued on the day of the filing of the bill, and was made returnable May 6, 1907. There being no service, an alias subpoena was issued July IGth, and personal service of the same was had on July 31, 1907. The defendant Kribs has interposed a plea of the statute of limitations in bar of the suit,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. American Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Isaacks v. JeffersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  2. United States v. SpreckelsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1943
  3. Yudin v. CarrollDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1944
  4. Mayne v. Jacob Michel Real Estate Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. United States ex rel. Pittsburg Planing Mill Co. v. ScheurmanDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API