Davis v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from Cecil County Court. Jlssumpsit for money had and received, brought by the appellees against the appellant. The cause, which is fully stated by the judge who delivered the opinion of this court, was argued before Buchanan, Ch. J. and Martin, Stephen, Archer, and Dorset, J.
1Opinion of the CourtDorsey, J.
The appellees, by Richard Davis, their guardian, instituted in Cecil county court an action for money had and received; and upon non assumpsit pleaded, the plaintiffs at the trial called William Hackett, by whom they proved that he was the crier of the vendue"on or about the 18th of February 1819, at the sale of the real estate of John Davis, deceased, by Jeremiah Cos-den, the trustee, at which time the defendant became the highest bidder and purchaser; that at the time of the sale he notified the persons present, that they purchased subject to these *38terms: First. That the tenant should…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Tyson v. TysonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
- Hamilton v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Geo. Bert. Cropper, Inc. v. Wisterco Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Bryan v. PinneyArizona Supreme Court · 1889
- Tyson v. TysonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.