Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Sextant Development Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 6, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 5:91-CV-00567 (EBB)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RECOMMENDED RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE JURY DEMAND
EAGAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this action, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). seeks foreclosure of a $4,500,000.00 mortgage which allegedly secures a note between defendant Sextant Development Corporation (“Sextant”) and Citytrust. The motion presently before this court is the plaintiff’s motion to strike the defendant’s jury demand dated October 21, 1991.
I. Factual Background
Citytrust originally initiated this foreclosure action against Sextant and Stuart Longman in the Connecticut Superior Court.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Smoke Ranch Development, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2015