Legal Opinion

King Finance Co. of New Orleans v. Howard

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1972No. 5068PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GULOTTA, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellee, King Finance Company of New Orleans, Inc., has instituted the proceeding against defendant-appellant, James T. Howard, to recover $113.59 together with interest, costs and attorney’s fees. Said amounts represent the alleged balance due on defendant’s obligation on a certain promissory note executed by him on October 7, 1968, with plaintiff as the named payee. Defendant answered plaintiff’s petition and pleaded as an affirmative defense thereto his discharge in bankruptcy. However, it is plaintiff’s assertion that this was not a dischargeable debt because…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. CHF Finance Company v. JochumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  2. De Latour v. LalaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Liberal Finance Gentilly, Inc. v. BristerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Beneficial Finance Company of Louisiana v. LathropLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. C H F Finance Discount A Co. v. RhodesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louisiana National Bank of Baton Rouge v. Talbot (In Re Talbot)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1981
  2. King Finance Co. of New Orleans v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Katz & Besthoff, Inc. v. NauerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API