Legal Opinion

In re Jacobs & Verstandig

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 12, 1906No. 28PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On application for discharge.

1Opinion of the Court

WOLVERTON, District Judge.

Heretofore, on August 6,190-1, the referee in bankruptcy made findings, and a recommendation based thereon, that the bankrupts were entitled to their discharge. Certain creditors, deeming the findings unsupported by the evidence, have moved the court to set them aside and to deny the recommendation. The specifications in opposition to the discharge are numerous; but, in the view I take of the matter, it will he necessary to consider only the sixth of the first charge, which is, in effect, that the bankrupts did, knowingly and fraudulently, while bankrupts, conceal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re QuackenbushDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1900
  2. In re BemisDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1900
  3. In re MendelsohnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1900
  4. In re O'GaraDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1899
  5. In re WebbDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re AgnewDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1915
  2. United States v. GreenbaumDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1918
  3. In re JamesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1910
  4. In re EliasDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1917
  5. United States v. FallmanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API