In re Bemis
District Court, N.D. New York
In Bankruptcy. On motion to confirm report of referee recommending that a discharge be denied the bankrupt, and on exceptions thereto.
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
The specification charging concealment is defective in that the essential averment, that the acts were done “knowingly and fraudulently,” is omitted, but as the evidence has been taken upon the theory that the specification was properly drawn, no injury can result from allowing an amendment nunc pro tunc. In re Pierce (D. C.) 103 Fed. 64.
The referee recommends that a discharge be refused upon the ground, first, that the bankrupt has concealed property from his trustee; second, that he has failed to keep books of account or records from which Ms true condition might be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re QuackenbushDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1900
- In re PierceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1900
- In re HirschmanDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1900
- In re MendelsohnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1900
- In re O'GaraDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re DauchyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1903
- In re AgnewDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1915
- Hudson v. Mercantile Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- In re KnaszakDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1907
- In re WakefieldDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.