Legal Opinion

Dieppe Corp. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 14, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Not only under the terms of the written agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant The City of New York, but under the general law applicable to agreements of this nature (Gushee v. City of New York, 42 App. Div. 37), the defendant commissioner of parks of the said city had the power from time to time to make reasonable rules and regulations with respect to the manner in which the business was to be conducted, the nature of the provender and the prices to be charged in connection therewith. His desire for a restaurant conducted at popular prices was not an unreasonable one, nor was his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gushee v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. MosesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  2. People v. RibinovichNew York Court of Special Session · 1939
  3. Theatre Festival, Inc. v. MosesNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Childs v. MosesNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Childs v. MosesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API