Childs v. Moses
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBenvenga, J.
The question presented on this motion for an injunction pendente lite is whether defendants Moses and Huie vacated their respective offices of commissioner of parks and commissioner of public works when they accepted appointments to positions on the city planning commission. The problem involves the construction of sections 531 and 895 of the New York City Charter, under which the appointments were concededlv made. These sections should be read in the light of their history. To this I shall briefly refer.
Prior to 1934 there were five separate borough park commissioners. By chapter 2 of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spencer v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Metzger v. SwiftNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Hulbert v. CraigNew York Supreme Court · 1925
- In re Hulbert v. CraigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Matter of Hulbert v. CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.