Legal Opinion

City of Murray v. Holcomb

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 25, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Hobson, Commissioner—

Beversing in part and affirming in part.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the circuit court dismissing upon general demurrer, the plaintiff’s petition. The facts stated in the petition are these: On January 19, 1931, the defendant S. F. Holcomb, in consideration of $1 in hand paid by the plaintiff H. C. Broach, executed and delivered to plaintiff the following writing:

“I hereby grant Clint Broach an option on my brick store property for two days for $7,000 cash. This January 19, 1931.
“S. F. Holcomb.”

Holcomb at the time he gave the option owned…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union Gas & Oil Co. v. Wiedeman Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1924
  2. Bates v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Henderson v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  4. Murphy, Thompson & Co. v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  5. Klatch v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  2. Fitzgan v. BurkeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Rice v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API