Legal Opinion
Fitzgan v. Burke
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 27, 1948No. 672PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Plaintiff, a real estate broker, sued defendant Burke for a commission. The complaint alleged that the broker was employed by defendant to negotiate a contract for the purchase by defendant of premises known as 1362 Tuckerman Street, Northwest, and defendant gave to the broker a signed offer, promising to pay him the regular commission in the event he was able to obtain a contract; that the broker succeeded in securing the acceptance of the offer by the owners of the premises, a Mr. and Mrs. Sapienza; and that the broker returned to defendant “a properly signed and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Michelson v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Doherty v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Cramer v. BallardMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Harten v. LöfflerSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Kuester v. RowlandsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Easter v. Kass-Berger, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Walker v. Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Apostolides v. ColecchiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Clay v. HansonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Roll Ex Rel. Ralph D. Kaiser Co. v. Rothenberg (In Re Rothenberg)District Court, District of Columbia · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.