Legal Opinion

Walker v. Boozer

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2004No. 29065PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment defining and fixing the width of an easement that allows ingress and egress across the servient estate. The judgment of the district court is affirmed in part and reversed in part.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

During the 1960’s, the road in question, Ruud Road, was an unimproved mountain road consisting of two tire tracks. Over the years, Ruud Road was improved. By the mid-eighties, Ruud Road had been graded, graveled and was approximately eleven to twelve feet wide at most locations. In the mid-eighties, the Bonneville County planning…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McKinney v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Harris v. Cassia CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Abbott v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Conley v. WhittleseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Gibbens v. WeisshauptIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Taylor v. AIA Services Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Seiniger Law Office, P.A. v. North Pacific InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Beckstead v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. DeHaven v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Cummings v. No Title Co of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API