Legal Opinion

Ernst v. General Refractories Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 9, 1953No. 11654_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause was considered by the Court on the record, briefs and oral argument of counsel for the respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that the findings of fact of the District Judge are fully supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and are accordingly accepted on this appeal;

And, that the relocation and construction of State Highway No. 174 was the official act of the Highway Department of the Commonwealth of Kentucky acting through the appellee by virtue- of its contract with the appellee, and that any damage resulting to appellant’s property by reason…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hutchins v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  2. Combs v. Codell Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  4. H. H. Miller Const. Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  5. Fife v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frost v. MeadIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Rich v. PappasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  3. Green v. ICI America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1973
  4. City of Louisville v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970
  5. Losee v. LoseeIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API