Legal Opinion
Banner v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 11, 1999No. 96-708LPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TIDWELL, Senior Judge.
A group of individuals and the Salamanca Coalition of United Taxpayers (“SCOUT”), who once leased portions of the Allegany Reservation in upstate New York, bring this Fifth Amendment takings and due process action. Plaintiffs contend that a 1990 congressional statute — the Seneca Nation Land Claims Settlement Act, 25 U.S.C. § 1774 (1994) (hereinafter “Act of 1990”) — extin*570guished plaintiffs’ leasehold renewal rights and unlawfully transferred plaintiffs’ ownership interest in improvements on the land to the Seneca Nation of Indians (“SNI”). Now before this court are…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Banner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Gregory T. Banner, John T. Brahaney, Marie A. Brahaney, Karen L. Ewing, Alice M. Fluent, Joseph D. Fluent, Nathan Frank, James R. Freaney, Christine Freany, Carol K. Goergen, Robert L. Johnson, Nancy C. O'brien, Sarah C. Owens, Ronald W. Schubert, Marjorie L. Schubert, Marie B. Schwab, Betty J. Seitz, Susan D. Swiech, Jerry A. Titus, Elizabeth Titus and the Salamanca Coalition of United Taxpayers,plaintiffs-Appellants v. United States,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001