Legal Opinion

Fry v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 22, 1955No. 36245PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

Defendant in error commenced this action, as plaintiff, against plaintiffs in error, as defendants, for damages for personal injuries consisting principally of a broken left ankle she suffered while patronizing a roller skating rink at a resort known as “Cedarvale”, between Davis and Ardmore, Oklahoma. The co-partners are the owners, and Lawrence Taylor, the other of the three defendants, is manager, of the skating rink. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, except when necessary for purposes of clarity, to refer to them by name.

■…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hansen v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. Frye v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Bluett v. Eli Skating ClubSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. Benedict Bros. Const. Co. v. DavoultSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Kelly v. FoxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. DurhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Bishop's Restaurants, Inc. of Tulsa v. WhombleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Cosmo Construction Company v. LodenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Lappe v. BlockerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. Croft v. DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API