Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Rouse

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 1907No. 15,141PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error from Miami district court; Winfield H. Sheldon, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This suit was for partition of lands, and the' construction of an antenuptial contract is the only question involved.

George W. Rouse died intestate in Miami county August 9, 1903, at the age of eighty-two years. He owned about two hundred acres of land at his death, and left surviving him, in addition to several children of a former marriage, his widow, Jane Rouse,- and one child by her. The controversy is between the children of the first marriage and Jane Rouse, the widow. He *312married Jane Rouse in 1874. Immediately before the marriage they…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Busenbark v. BusenbarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Jenness v. CutlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  3. Helm v. HelmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. Sutherland v. SutherlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. In re Estate of PeetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Irwin v. IrwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Dennis v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Girard v. GirardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Kremer v. KremerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Montgomery v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API