Legal Opinion
Ruling Mengv. Ching-Wu "Paul" Chu
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 5, 2016No. Nos. 2014-1746, 2015-1390PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Chief Judge.
Appellants Pei-Herng Hor (“Hor”) and Ruling Meng (“Meng”) filed this suit against Appellee Ching-Wu Chu (“Chu”) under 35 U.S.C. § 256 for correction of inventor-ship of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,709,418 (“'418 patent”) and 7,056,866 (“'866 patent”). Following an eight-day bench trial, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas denied both parties’ claims. For reasons discussed below, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
A
The circumstances giving rise to this appeal are summarized in the district court’s decisions, Hor v. Chu, No. 4:08-CV-3584, 2015 WL 269123 (S.D.Tex. Jan.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ethicon, Inc. And Inbae Yoon, M.D. v. United States Surgical Corporation and Young Jae ChoiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Fina Oil and Chemical Co. And Fina Technology, Inc. v. John A. Ewen v. Abbas Razavi, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Symantec Corp. v. Computer Associates International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Jeffrey R. Sewall and Ronald G. Walters v. Ronald G. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- McV Inc. v. King-Seeley Thermos CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maxtech Consumer Products, Ltd. v. Robert Bosch Tool Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Pro Marketing Sales v. Secturion SystemsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020