Legal Opinion

State v. West

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1991No. 9010SC900PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant brings forward fifteen assignments of error for our review. She has not addressed her first, second, seventh, eleventh, or twelfth assignments in her brief, and we therefore deem them abandoned. N.C.R. App. P., Rule 28. Her remaining assignments deal with the propriety of certain expert testimony, testimony dealing with prior acts of conduct, the failure of the trial court to dismiss the charges at the end of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, and the trial court’s finding that the offense was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel. We find no…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. RedfernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. FritschSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API