Johnson v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
315 Ga. 876
FINAL COPY S22A0964. JOHNSON v. THE STATE. PINSON, Justice. Over the past two decades, this Court has applied an absolute rule that anything filed by a criminal defendant on his or her own while still represented by counsel is a “legal nullity.” In this case, we asked the parties and amici whether that rule is correct. In other words, is a pro se filing made by a defendant who is actually or presumptively represented by counsel always a nullity? For the reasons set out below, we now answer that question in the negative. Although a defendant does not have a constitutional or…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Isaacs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Wasserman v. Franklin CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2025
- COBB COUNTY v. FLOAMSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
- REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE v. ETERNAL VIGILANCE ACTION, INC. (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2025
- Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.