Legal Opinion
Fairbanks v. O'Hagan
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 9, 2017No. Civil Action No. 16-10023-NMGPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, J.
This case arises out of the arrest of Matthew Fairbanks (“Fairbanks” or “plaintiff’), the subsequent search of his apartment and car and the seizure of his property. Fairbanks claims that defendants, various police officers, employed by the Town of Danvers, Massachusetts, 1) falsely arrested him, 2) conducted an unlawful search and seizure, 3) violated his' right to bear arms, 4) violated the Equal Protection Clause and 5) took his property without just compensation, all in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mangual v. City of WorcesterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Aikens v. NCCPD Chief Officer Colonel Vaughn M. Bond, Jr.District Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Brodrick v. Washington County Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2023
- Keith Brown v. Michael Leslie, Keith Barnes, and Beau LiretteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2026
- Mangual v. WorcesterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.