Legal Opinion

Chavez v. United Motor Car Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 2, 1934No. 14638PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Judge.

This is a suit by a prospective purchaser of an automobile to recover a deposit of $200 from an automobile dealer. The petition alleges that the written contract under which the deposit was made is a nudum pactum, containing a potestative condition, and the defendant is illegally retaining plaintiff’s money.

Defendant answered admitting that a contract was entered into and that the deposit of $200 was made thereunder, but denied that the contract was illegal, and avers that plaintiff had breached it by refusing to purchase either a new or second hand car as he was obligated to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. HaberSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. Campbell v. A. Lambert & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  3. Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  4. Caddo Oil & Mining Co. v. Producers' Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  5. Succession of TrouillySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Long v. Foster & Associates, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Bacher v. HigginsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Farnsworth v. HarrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Anderson v. StruveLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Henry v. ScottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API