Legal Opinion
Dias v. Sacramento County Welfare Department (In re Dias)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California
Decided February 20, 1987No. Bankruptcy Nos. 285-01936-B-7, 285-01937-B-7; Adv. Nos. 286-0311, 286-0261Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND DECISION
DAVID E. RUSSELL, Bankruptcy Judge.
Introduction
These two cases represent yet another skirmish in the continuing battle between Social Security beneficiaries and state welfare agencies over the rights to payments from the Social Security Administration (SSA). The fact pattern and issues before the Court are the same as those in Vazquez, Guerrero and Compton, 42 B.R. 609 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1984) (Vazquez I) which was reversed by the District Court, with the reversal being affirmed upon further appeal in Vazquez, Guerrero and Compton, 788 F.2d 130 (3rd Cir.1986)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Moore v. ColauttiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Edward Pirsig Farms, Inc. v. John Deere Co. (In Re Pirsig Farms, Inc.)District Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- 14 Collier bankr.cas.2d 599, Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,097 in Re Vazquez, Guerrero and Compton, Debtors. Vazquez, Agustin Guerrero, David R., and Compton, Barry A. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Trejo v. County of Sacramento (In Re Trejo)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.