Legal Opinion

United States v. Courney

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided April 21, 1981No. ACM 22810PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MILES, Judge:

The accused’s conviction for receiving stolen property rests, in part, on his pretrial statement accepted into evidence over defense objection. The accused, although he had been advised by his assigned counsel not to talk with Air Force Office of Special Investigation (OSI) agents, decided not to follow that'advice and, on his own initiative, went to the OSI office to give them a statement. Under the particular facts of this case, we hold the statement admissible although the OSI failed to contact his military counsel prior to interviewing him.

The accused was convicted by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. TempiaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. DillonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  2. United States v. OwensU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API