United States v. Courney
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
MILES, Judge:
The accused’s conviction for receiving stolen property rests, in part, on his pretrial statement accepted into evidence over defense objection. The accused, although he had been advised by his assigned counsel not to talk with Air Force Office of Special Investigation (OSI) agents, decided not to follow that'advice and, on his own initiative, went to the OSI office to give them a statement. Under the particular facts of this case, we hold the statement admissible although the OSI failed to contact his military counsel prior to interviewing him.
The accused was convicted by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. TempiaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. DillonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. OwensU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981