Legal Opinion

King v. Puryear Wood Products

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 14, 1973No. 73-16PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

This is a “hernia” workmen’s compensation case. See Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1313 (e) (Repl. 1960). The appellant contends that the commission erred in not granting him a temporary total disability award because under the allegedly undisputed facts, he sustained a compensable hernia resulting from severe strain which arose out of and in the course of his employment. We find substantial evidence to support the commission’s finding denying recovery.

The evidence and testimony reveal that appellant’s work involved removing boards from a conveyor belt and placing them on a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brower Manufacturing Co. v. WillisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. May v. Crompton-Arkansas Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Harkleroad v. CotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Crossett Co. v. ChildersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. Potlatch Forests, Inc. v. BurksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hammer v. Intermed Northwest & Rockwood InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Ayres v. Historic Preservation AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API