Legal Opinion

Potlatch Forests, Inc. v. Burks

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 22, 1968No. 5-4554PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellants, Potlatch Forests, Inc., and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, appeal from a circuit court order that set aside an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission denying Carl Burks compensation benefits for a hernia he experienced, because he failed to meet the five requirements laid down in Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1313(e) (Repl. 1960). That section provides:

“(e) Hernia: In all cases of claims for hernia it shall be shown to the satisfaction of the Commission:

(,1) That the occurrence of the hernia immediately followed as the result of sudden effort, severe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams Manufacturing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Prince Poultry Co. v. StevensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  3. Fagan Electric Company v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. Crossett Co. v. ChildersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vangilder v. FaulkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Harkleroad v. CotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. King v. Puryear Wood ProductsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API