Saddle Mountain Minerals, LLC v. City of Richland
District Court, E.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 SADDLE MOUNTAIN MINERALS, L.L.C., NO. 4:22-CV-5055-TOR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 MOTION FOR SUMMARY v. JUDGMENT 10 CITY OF RICHLAND, a municipal 11 corporation of the State of Washington, 12 Defendant. 13 14 BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 15 (ECF No. 47). This matter was submitted for consideration without oral argument. 16 The Court has reviewed the record and files herein, the completed briefing, and is 17 fully informed. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.