Legal Opinion

Weinberg v. Magid

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 13, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of contract, in which the plaintiff seeks to recover $1,440 and interest thereon under the terms of an alleged express agreement between him and the defendant. The case was heard in the Superior Court without a jury. At the close of the evidence the presiding judge found for the defendant and, at the request of the plaintiff, reported the case to this court upon the following terms: “If said court is of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover, judgment may be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,440 with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blaisdell v. AhernMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  2. Thomas v. CaulkettMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ackert v. BarkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  4. Belding v. SmytheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  5. Williams v. FowleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chase v. PevearMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Baskin v. PassMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. J. Mannos & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Graustein v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Sullivan v. GouletteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API