Legal Opinion

Blaisdell v. Ahern

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 7, 1887PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Allen, J.

This is an action by an attorney at law to recover for professional services. The only question argued is, whether the services were rendered under a contract illegal for champerty or maintenance, so that no compensation can be recovered for them.

The parties were residents of this Commonwealth. The defendants were children of a father1 who had been a stranger to his family for years. They earned their living as domestic servants, and one or both of them had lived in the family of which the plaintiff was a member, and had known him from boyhood. They heard that their father had died in New…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McPherson v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Ackert v. BarkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Belding v. SmytheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Scott v. HarmonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Noble v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Gill v. Richmond Co-operative Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. McInerney v. Massasoit Greyhound Association, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. BradyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Baskin v. PassMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API