Legal Opinion

Wolters v. Rossi

California Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1899No. S. F. No. 1277PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from Superior Court, Fresno county. Action by Henry Wolters and others against Lena Rossi- and others. From a judgment for defendants and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed. The original complaint herein was filed March 15, 1895. On April 1, 1895, the summons was filed showing proof of service on the defendants Lena Bossi and C. Bossi on March 20th, and on the defendant the Farmers’ Bank on March 18th.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

These appeals are from the judgment and from the order denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. Defendant C. Bossi was a judgment debtor of plaintiffs. On January 29, 1895, an execution issued upon the judgment of plaintiffs was returned nulla bona. On the twenty-third day of February following plaintiffs instituted proceedings supplementary to execution, and secured an order for the examination of C. Bossi and his wife, the defendant Lena Bossi. The examination was held upon February 28, 1895, before a referee. Bossi and his wife were examined. Upon the examination it was disclosed that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Bull v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Acock v. HalseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Windhaus v. BootzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Palace Hardware Co. v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API