Arguelles v. Ridgeway
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROTHENBERG.
Plaintiffs, Mario T. and Merian P. Arg-uelles (the Arguelleses), appeal from the ruling of the trial court allowing defendant, Reese Ridgeway, a complete setoff against the Arguelleses’ judgment. Ridgeway cross-appeals the trial court’s judgment allowing the Arguelleses interest on their original judgment. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.
In 1981, the Arguelleses entered into a real estate contract to purchase a motel from Ridgeway. Pursuant to the sale, they executed a $245,000 promissory note payable to Ridgeway secured by a deed of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Southern Industrial Banking Corporation, Debtor. Thomas Duvoisin, Liquidating Trustee, and Bank of Commerce, Intervening v. Emmett J. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Mesa Sand & Gravel Co. v. Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Canton Oil Corp. v. District Court In & For Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Golden Press, Inc. v. RylandsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Slaw Construction Corp. v. Hughes Foulkrod Construction Co. (In Re Slaw Construction Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Equitex, Inc. v. UngarColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Durdin v. Cheyenne Mountain BankColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Kennedy v. Gillam Development Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Driscoll v. District Court for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Arguelles v. RidgewayColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.