Legal Opinion
Equitex, Inc. v. Ungar
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided July 5, 2002No. 01CA1253PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DAVIDSON.
In this declaratory judgment action, defendant, Bertrand T. Ungar, appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding that plaintiffs, Equitex, Inc. and Henry Fong, owe defendant no indemnification. We affirm.
In 1996, a judgment was entered against defendant in favor of Thomas W. Itin on claims under the Rights in Stolen Property statute, § 18-4-405, C.R.S.2001. The claims were based on defendant’s involvement in a 1990 stock transaction in which Fong, acting for his brother, sold Itin stock in a company called Roadmaster; the purchase price was wired to defendant’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Churchey v. Adolph Coors Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Colorado Water Conservation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Itin v. UngarSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Brody v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Biondi v. Beekman Hill House Apartment Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Grynberg v. Total S.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Haynes Trane Service Agency, Inc. v. American Standard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Combs v. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLPCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc. v. Sonitrol Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Tara Woods Ltd. Partnership v. Fannie MaeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.