Legal Opinion
CIFUENTES v. JEMAIL
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 25, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02874Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARIA DOMINGUEZ CIFUENTES CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-2874 Plaintiff, v. DR. JAY JEMAIL Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Rufe, J. March 25, 2021 Plaintiff Maria Cifuentes filed this action against Defendant Dr. Jay Jemail seeking damages for injurious falsehood, libel, slander, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, loss of consortium and breach of contract.1 Defendant now moves to dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion will be…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Davis v. Wells Fargo, U.S.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Fine v. CheccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Edward Arthur v. Maersk, Inc. D/B/A Maersk Line Ltd. Dyn Corp. Technical Services D/B/A Dyn Marine Services the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.