Legal Opinion

Camden Clay Co. v. Town of New Martinsville

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Wetzel County. Action by the Camden Clay Company against the Town of New Martinsville. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

ROBINSON, PRESIDENT:

The Town of New Martinsville, a municipal corporation., on June 11, 1902, entered into a contract with O. Skidmore for the paving'of particularly named streets. For doing the work in the manner specified, Skidmore was to receive stated prices for the curbing, excess excavating, and brick paving necessary to. complete the contract. The work was to be completed by November first, of that year. Payments were to be made to Skid-more every thirty days, upon estimates of eighty per cent, of the work completed. Final payment was to be made at the completion of all the work and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. City of CorrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. American Exchange BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  3. Davis v. Wayne County CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Armstrong v. Taylor County CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harrold v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Allison v. City of ChesterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Doss v. O'TooleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State ex rel. Old National Bank of Martinsburg v. City of PhilippiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Kanawha Manufacturing Co. v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API