Marcum v. Adventist Health System/West

*169HASELTON, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals in this case involving claims of medical negligence, informed consent, and “spoliation” of relevant documents. The court directed verdicts in defendants’1 favor on all claims. Plaintiff appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in excluding her scientific evidence of medical causation. See State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285, 899 P2d 663 (1995); State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 687 P2d 751 (1984). In addition, with respect to her informed consent and negligent spoliation claims, plaintiff asserts that the trial court erred in directing verdicts in defendants’ favor on…