Legal Opinion

City of Emporia v. Randolph

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1895No. 10441PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Original Proceeding in Mandamus. Action by the City of Emporia against W. A. Randolph, judge of the fifth judicial district, for mandamus. The opinion, filed November 9, 1895, states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Martin, C. J.: On June 18, 1895, at the courthouse in Emporia, the plaintiff, a city of the second class, presented to the defendant, the judge of the fifth judicial district, a petition for the extension of the boundaries of the city. The defendant declined to hear the petition, on the ground that the duties sought to be imposed upon the judge by section 121 of the act relating to cities of the second class (¶ 884, Gen. Stat. 1889) are in nowise judicial, in their nature, but rather legislative.

If this question were a new one, the writer would…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Callen v. City of Junction CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  2. Huling v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Taylor v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. City of Hutchinson v. LeimbachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Petitt v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Ruland v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. In Re City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API