Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Groover

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 19, 1930No. 20093PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. The evidence authorized the verdict.

2. The instruction embodied in the defendant’s request to charge was substantially given in the charge of ‘the court to the jury. McKie v. State, 165 Ga. 210 (6) (140 S. E. 625); Ga. Ry. & Power Co. v. Head, 155 Ga. 337 (116 S. E. 620).

3. In a suit to recover for damage to the plaintiff’s automobile, and for a personal injury to himself resulting in reduced earning capacity, and for pain and suffering, an instruction that if the jury found for the plaintiff they “might also find some amount for pain and suffering,” contained no expression of opinion by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. City Council of Augusta v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. HaralsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McDow v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Jones v. HutchinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Gilbert v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Glennville Hatchery, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Atlanta Veterans Transportation, Inc. v. CagleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API