City v. Pullen, Unpublished Decision (6-9-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Defendant-appellant Gary Pullen appeals from his conviction and sentence for Criminal Trespassing. Pullen contends that the trial court erred by failing to investigate sufficiently his claim, made just before trial, that his counsel was ineffective. Pullen further contends that his trial counsel was ineffective. Finally, Pullen contends that his conviction for Criminal Trespassing was not supported by sufficient evidence.
We agree with Pullen that the trial court did not sufficiently investigate his claim, made just before the start of trial, that his court-appointed counsel was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. DealOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. PraterOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Kettering v. BerryOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.