Legal Opinion

State v. Deal

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1969No. 68-120PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

Appellant’s first assignment of error is that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. His court-appointed counsel did not file notice of alibi defense, nor did he subpoena the witnesses that appellant says were needed for this defense. From the record, it is impossible to determine whether appellant was adequately represent*19ed, because it contains nothing indicating why no witnesses were called or why no alibi defense was prepared. It is entirely possible that appointed counsel talked to those witnesses and concluded that there was no worthwhile alibi defense. The Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tompsett v. State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. KeithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2006

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API