Legal Opinion
Mendel v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 24, 1977No. 2 CA-CIV 2545PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
Appellants operate a business in Pima County, Arizona known as Western Television, which sells and services electronic entertainment equipment. Since 1948 they have advertised in the yellow pages as an authorized retailer and servicer of Motorola appliances. In the 1973-1974 telephone directory, three ads which identified appellants’ business as an authorized Motorola dealer and service representative were erroneously omitted from the yellow pages. These ads cost appellants $55.80 per year.
The written contract between the parties concerning these advertisements…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Wille v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Gas House, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Hazel B. McTighe v. New England Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Discount Fabric House of Racine, Inc. v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- ELEC. SEC. SYSTEMS v. Southern BellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Pinnacle Computer Services, Inc. v. Ameritech Publishing, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Pigman v. Ameritech Publishing, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Morris v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.